Amplifying Climate Feedbacks
The IPCC is called the voice of climate change science.
The 2014 IPCC AR5 all important SPM (Summary for Policy Makers) reports were cursory on feedbacks, especially the largest sources in the Arctic.
Here are collected the AR5 references to Arctic feedbacks.
A 2012 UNEP report addressed the fact that the IPCC does not include permafrost carbon feedback, but the fact is the IPCC
AR5 2013-14 assessment omits all carbon feedbacks in its global warming projections.
The inevitable large degree of additional warming from these large slow feedbacks are totally excluded from the assessments because they are not included in the all important climate sensitivity. With the slow feedbacks the sensitivity is at least 6, but we still using a fast feedback only sensitivity of 3.
The IPCC 2007 AR4 included some carbon feedbacks but only as an uncertainty increasing the upper range of projected warming, that is not used for policy making (it should be). For a high emissions scenario (A2) this increased the IPCC AR4 projected warming by over 1.0C, and omitting this from the mitigation projections made for an error of 30%.
A 2013 review that included Earth system modelling found a large increase is climate sensitivity when carbon feedbacks are included, which would lead to at 50-100% increase in projected warming. "Traditionally, only fast feedbacks have been considered (with the other feedbacks either ignored or treated as forcing), which has led to estimates of the climate sensitivity for doubled CO2 concentrations of about 3C. The 2×CO2 Earth system sensitivity is higher than this, being∼4–6C if the ice sheet/vegetation albedo feedback is included in addition to the fast feedbacks, and higher still if climate–GHG feedbacks are also included."
July 2013 Review Climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene M. Previdi, et al
A 2013 study using the Canada climate model showed that zeroing CO2 emissions but not changing the other GHGs and adding in just a small permafrost carbon feedback results in atmospheric CO2 not stabilizing and global temperature slowly continuing to increase.
August 2013 Nature paper Climate Extremes and the Carbon Cycle finds extreme weather events compromise terrestrial carbon uptake, confirming that heat waves droughts and storms are a carbon feedback source. Terrestrial ecosystems absorb approximately 11 billion tons less carbon dioxide every year as the result of the extreme climate events than they could if the events did not occur. That is equivalent to approximately a third of global CO2 emissions per year.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-08-extreme-weather-events-fuel-climate.html#jCp
A 2012 published NASA study
has found tropical rainforests, that have been absorbing more CO2 under the rising atmospheric CO2, may be becoming less efficient as the rainforest temperature rises. This is predicted with increasing atmospheric CO2 as a strong carbon feedback
caused by global warming.
Terrestrial carbon feedback: Warming soil and vegetation emit
more CO2 as well as taking up more CO2 by photosynthesis
which a carbon feedback called the 'terrestrial' carbon feedback.
Its value projected by models by 2100 ranges from 0.5C to 1.5C.
These feedbacks are not generally classified as fast or slow,
coming some where in between. The higher range of 1.5C includes
Amazon die back and all research supports the prediction of Amazon
die back from increasing drying and severe drought.
Another deferred terrestrial carbon feedback is due to today's negative terrestrial carbon feedback. More atmospheric CO2 stimulates more photosynthesis forests and wood lands, which is acting as a large sink. The planet's land-based carbon "sink" has kept 186 billion to 192 billion tons of carbon out of the atmosphere since the mid-20th century, which is warmimg reduction of 0.3C (2012 Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake).
Some time this carbon sink will be saturated and switch to a carbon source. Most models (2012 research Terrestrial ecosystem carbon response ) say this will happen this century and about mid century.
The IPCC AR4 reported that above 3C from preindustrial the terrestrial carbon sink become a net source, which must be avoided at all costs.
Global wetlands emit more methane when warmed- not accounted for in the assessments.
Peatlands: Vast regions of high carbon peat rich wetlands (peatlands) are emitting more carbon as they are warmed - not accounted for. These are subArctic and tropical.
thawing permafrost is emitting carbon as methane and some CO2, and Arctic ocean floor frozen methane gas hydrate is melting and starting to emit methane into the atmosphere. These are the largest stores of carbon on the planet and are not accounted in assessments of future global climate change (UNEP Policy Implications of Warming Permafrost 2012
Arctic summer sea ice melting
is a visible dramatic effect of global warming and it's a large feedback. The vast expanse of white ice in the summer, cools the northern hemisphere and to an extent the planet as a whole. With its loss, the rate of global warming will increase. This is not included in the climate models. The models for projecting melting rate of the Arctic summer sea ice are in error by 30 years right now. (more on the Arctic below)Research predicts
that thawing permafrost (irreversible) will switch the Arctic from carbon sink to a net carbon source in the 2020s.
Climate-carbon cycle coupling is expected to add carbon dioxide
to the atmosphere as the climate system warms, but the magnitude of this
feedback is uncertain. (This
is the excluded carbon feedbacks)
"This increases the uncertainty in the trajectory of carbon
dioxide emissions required to achieve a particular stabilization level of
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Based on current understanding of
climate-carbon cycle feedback, model studies suggest that to stabilize at 450
ppm carbon dioxide could require that cumulative emissions over the 21st century
be reduced from an average of approximately 670 [630 to 710] GtC (2460 [2310 to
2600] GtCO2) to approximately 490 [375 to 600] GtC (1800 [1370 to
excluding these inevitable carbon feedbacks the IPCC instead of considering risk
has included an error of 30% in its calculated emissions reduction for
Quotes are from IPCC 2007
The greatest risk from global warming to humanity and all life
is the multiple combined 'cascading' Arctic climate feed backs.
These are the following.
o Melting back of subarctic spring-summer snow cover.
o Melting decline of Arctic summer sea ice extent.
o Warming far north peat lands - emits methane.
o Thawing permafrost - emitting methane & nitrous oxide.
o Melting sea floor Arctic methane hydrate - methane.
Methane and nitrous oxide are much more powerful greenhouse gases than CO2.
The greatest single risk is an abrupt spreading destabilization of sub sea floor methane hydrates.
Positive feedback from warming may cause the
release of carbon or methane from the terrestrial biosphere and oceans (See Meehl et
al., 2007), which would add to the mitigation required.
Quote from IPCC AR4 2.2.4 Risk
of catastrophic or abrupt change.
The IPCC uses climate computer models projections of global
temperature increase to estimate the future degrees of warming.
Models used to date in the IPCC warming projections do not include
the amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks that the scientists now call
In the 2013 AR5 no (inevitable) extra carbon feedback warming was included in the new RCP scenario projections, and only the lowest terrestrial carbon feedback range was included in the AR5 carbon budget of more fossil fuels to burn. Consequently the AR5 global warming projection for business as usual isthe lowest since 1990. Unlike the AR4 the AR5 does not provide figure or formula for correcting the omitted terrestrial carbon feedback warming.
It is definite that carbon feedbacks will add to the warming over time.
The IPCC says "Warming tends to reduce land and ocean uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing the fraction of anthropogenic emissions that remains in the atmosphere."
For the A2 scenario, for example, the IPCC says the climate-carbon cycle feedback increases the corresponding global average warming at 2100 by more than 1.0°C.
This does not include carbon feedback from peatland ,thawing permafrost or melting methane hydrate.
This additional 1.5C is not included in the 'most likely' temperature projections.
A 2012 carbon cycle paper, High sensitivity of future global warming
to land carbon cycle processes, finds the carbon feedback is large- at least 1.5C by 2100
Positive and negative feedback
There are two kinds of feedback in terms of amplifying warming (+ve) or reducing warming (-ve).
We are most used to negative feedback systems used for safety. If a heater gets to hot there is a built -ve feedback that switches it off.
But in the climate system there is no such safety mechanism- feedbacks act in the dangerously +ve feedback way.
In the case of global climate change positive feedbacks to global warming lead to more global warming. Global warming causes more global warming
Furthermore the increased warming accelerates over time and temperature.
Climate system +ve feedback is a global warming impact multiplier.
Considering all the feedbacks the +ve feedbacks are incomparably larger the -ve, and
the more the warming the larger the +ve feedbacks (but not the -ve).
Positive feedbacks that operate by the planet emitting more carbon dioxide (CO2) or methane (CH4) are +ve carbon (cycle) feedbacks.
By definition positive carbon feedback is the greatest risk caused by global warming - because our industrial global warming responds by emitting carbon GHGs CO2 and methane and that boosts global warming more that increases carbon feed back even more etc... - in the ultimate vicious cycle.
There are a great many of the +ve feedbacks and Earth has vast pools (stores) of carbon vulnerable to global warming- the largest being Arctic.
The warming planet emits CO2 methane and nitrous oxide- thawing permafrost is doing all this now.
Climate system positive feedbacks or loops tend to be self perpetuating and accelerating making them catastrophically dangerous.
One positive feedback may increase one or more other positive feedbacks - 'cascading' feedbacks, which leads to runaway rapid warming.
The big example is the Arctic involving Arctic methane.
There are unforeseen positive feedbacks
The melting of glaciers forms deep channels of water torrents and lake at
the glacier base lubricating its retreat.
Fast and Slow feedbacks
There are 2 sorts of feedbacks in terms of their speed of response.
Fast feedbacks (or Charney feedbacks) are the only ones accounted for
by the IPPC in global warming projections are the fast feedbacks.
These act on an immediate time scale and are water vapor, clouds
(+ve & -ve) aerosols (+ve and -ve). latest research confirms the strong
water vapor feedback and that clouds have a net positive (bad) feedback
Water vapor is a GHG and the largest +ve feedback.
It about doubles the warming caused by a GHG alone.
Warm air holds more water as global warming increases so amplifying
the global warming by a factor of 2 for warming by GHG alone.
It is a fast feedback
Slow feedbacks are much slower to respond to warming, but as they do
they are very large and can lead to catastrophic accelerating degrees of
They are the albedo cooling loss from the loss of ice sheets, warming wetland
peat (high carbon), thawing permafrost (CO2 CH4 N2O) and sub sea floor methane.
These large slow feedback are excluded by the IPCC global warming projections
in the assessments. They are also not included in the calculation of the all
important climate sensitivity.
by descending date
26 August 2019
Acid oceans are shrinking plankton, fueling faster climate change (acidification phytoplankton) 21 August 2019 Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils, Xanthe J. Walker
24 June 2019 Damage to the ozone layer climate change forming feedback
20 June 2019 Climate change threatening the microscopic creatures our lives depend on, which could feedback 1 June 2019 millennial and fast-cycling soil carbon are equally sensitive to warming (ancient permafrost Carbon)
15 April 2019 Warming Arctic permafrost releasing large amounts of potent greenhouse gas (nitrous oxide)
20 March 2019 Thawing permafrost produces more methane than expected
23 March 2019 Evidence for non-steady-state carbon emissions from snow-scoured alpine tundra 18 March 2018 Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth FEEDBACK EMISSIONS 25 Feb 2919 The loss of clouds could add another 8 °C to global warming
Warming Effects of Spring Rainfall Increase Methane Emissions From Thawing Permafrost
19 Nov 2018 Potential shift from a carbon sink to a source in Amazonian peatlands under a changing climate
15 Oct 2018 Forests greening but also C sink failing
17 Sept 2018 Path-dependent reductions in CO2 emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release.
5 Sept 2017 Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change
20 Aug 2018 Plants may absorb less carbon under climate change
NASA 20 Aug article on below Unexpected future boost of methane possible from Arctic permafrost- Abrupt thaws
15 Aug 2018 21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes
9 Aug 2018 NASA finds Amazon drought leaves long legacy of damage
30 March 2015 Causal feedbacks in climate change (Ice ages driven by GHG feedback)
The science of global climate change is all about feedbacks -
these mostly positive (bad) amplifying feedbacks. As global
warming increases so do the +ve feedbacks. What negative
feedbacks there are have little effect.
Global warming inherently increases global warming.
The biggest feedbacks were predicted long ago, but are kicking much
sooner than expected.
It is the biggest reason why we are in a state of dire planetary emergency.
The 2014 IPCC AR5 assessment finds that the carbon cycle will be a +ve
(amplifying) feedback this century. The highest estimate of extra carbon
feedback warming in the AR5 is 1.8C by 2100 (B. Booth). How ever,
'many key processes relevant to decomposition of carbon are missing in
models (Todd-Brown et al., 2012), and particularly for permafrost carbon
and for carbon in boreal and tropical wetlands and peatlands, despite the
large amount of carbon stored in these ecosystems and their vulnerability to
warming'. (IPCC AR5 WG2 ch 6 p 40).
Also 'the negative effects of elevated tropospheric ozone on NPP (plant growth) have not been taken into account by most current carbon cycle models'. 'Plants are known to suffer damage due to exposure to levels of ozone (O3) above about 40 ppb (Ashmore, 2005). Model simulations of plant O3 damage on the carbon cycle have found a reduction in terrestrial carbon storage 2005 - 2100 up to 260 PgC (Sitch et al., 2007) AR5 Ch 6.
Today most of the largest sources of catastrophically dangerous feedbacks are operant or triggered, and today we are committed to a far greater degree of global warming - that will cause far greater feedbacks accelerating the rate of warming. Note the rate of warming is critical to ecosystems, species, and agriculture.
It is shocking therefore that the IPCC omits the inevitable large increase in global warming due to the largest +ve feedbacks and in the 2013 AR5 omitted all carbon cycle warming from its RCP scenario global warming projections.
The largest source of amplifying carbon feedback by far is subsea floor frozen sold pressurized methane gas -hydrate. The methane hydrate situation is far worse than
we ever imagined.
CLIMATE EMERGENCY INSTITUTE
The health and human rights approach to climate change
2015 Planetary amplifying feedback confirmed The big (Mar 2015) climate change feedback news is that the strong +ve amplifying natural GHG feedback (CO2-methane-nitrous oxide) that ends ice changes by switching to an interglacial warm period, is confirmed by research (global warming does increase warming). University of Exeter. "Direct evidence for a positive feedback in climate change: Global warming itself will likely accelerate warming." ScienceDaily.
The most dangerous of all feedbacks to the planet is methane from melting sub-sea floor frozen solid methane gas hydrates, and from Oct 2015 research it looks like it has started, as also previously suggested by Arctic research.
2014 NAS Royal Society 'Models vary in their projections of how much additional warming to expect, but all such models agree that the overall net effect of feedbacks is to amplify the CO2-only warming by a factor of 1.5 to 4.5'.
23 April 2015 research ARCTIC MULTI-FEEDBACK RUNAWAY EFFECT
The more we research the more we find that many large +ve amplifying
feedbacks will greatly accelerate global climate change, and are already trigerred.
Definition The NOAA says a positive feedback is a process in which an initial change
will bring about an additional change in the same direction. A feedback loop then
does not have to be complete to the point of an global warming increase.
A feedback exists if the process is established whereby warming will be made to increase.
The best example of a climate change amplifying feedback due to global warming (already happening) is increased forest fires that emit CO2.
The present biggest feedback is a fast acting one due to water vapour, which is a GHG. Warmer air holds more water vapor hence a +ve feedback. The water vapor feedback doubles the warming caused by a GHG alone. 2014 research
determined that this will act as an increasing climate change amplifier.
The 2014 IPCC AR5 found that 'Based on Earth System Models, there is high confidence that the feedback between climate change and the carbon cycle will amplify global warming', but the AR5 published model projections of warming did not account for any of the large planetary sources of amplifying carbon feedbacks.
Carbon feedback sources carry on emitting so long as the warming that triggered them lasts, & the higher the warming the greater the feedback - projected to make global warming last over 10,000 years (2013 R. Zeebe).
July 2012 Arctic warming linked to combination of reduced sea ice (feedback) and global atmospheric warming (global warming)
PPt. Biospheric Feedback Loops & Rapid Climate Change J.Cairns 2010
Carbon sink to carbon source. Today it is estimated that half of our extra GHG emissions are being taken up by more forest growth (terrestrial carbon sink) and the oceans (ocean carbon sink.
This is a negative feedback to CO2 pollution. We know that in time this increase in carbon uptake will be come less efficient and it will switch from being a carbon sink to a carbon source,+ve feedback to global warming.
Mar 2016 This has started-The terrestrial biosphere as a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.
Jan 2016 MIT Annual carbon sequestration rate in protected areas such as rainforests will decline by about 40 percent between now and 2100.
December 2016 Massive amounts of carbon dioxide could leak from the soil by mid-century
March 2016 Land flux heating emissions of methane & nitrous oxide exert double the cooling effect of CO2 land (green vegetation) uptake.
Mar 2015We have CO2, methane and nitrous oxide feedback emissions
Carbon sink will switch
to source (IPCC 2001)
July 2012 Reduction in carbon uptake during turn of the century drought in western North America C. Schwalm [Projected to increase].
We show that the area-integrated strength of the western North American carbon sink declined by 30–298 Tg C yr−1 during the 2000–2004 drought. We further document a pronounced drying of the terrestrial biosphere during this period, together with a reduction in river discharge and a loss of cropland productivity. We compare our findings with previous palaeoclimate reconstructions and show that the last drought of this magnitude occurred more than 800 years ago. Based on projected changes in precipitation and drought severity, we estimate that the present mid-latitude carbon sink of 177–623 Tg C yr−1 in western North America could disappear by the end of the century
*We are releasing about 10 billion metric tons of carbon into the atmosphere per year. The world's soils contain about 3,500 billion metric tons of carbon. If soil carbon is added to the atmosphere due to microbial activity in warmer soils, that will accelerate the global warming process. And once this self-reinforcing feedback begins, there is no way to turn it off.
ARCTIC rapidly warming is emitting CO2, methane and nitrous oxide-all more than assumed
The Arctic Time Bomb is Triggered (PDF April 2019 update)
March 2019 Very strong atmospheric methane growth =-Feedback